https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99984
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
The same change should be made there (in uclibc). FWIW, I looked for a bug
database to report the problem there but, AFAICS, uclibc-ng is the currently
maintained fork, but it has no bug database
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99984
--- Comment #5 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> The following Glibc bug calls for suppressing the warning by adding
> attribute access none to the function declaration:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99984
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99984
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99984
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cc863ca8f48662e9c9339710fa303587479bf71
commit r11-8075-g8cc863ca8f48662e9c9339710fa303587479bf71
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99984
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 50533
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50533=edit
Demo patch
I tried to initialize this struct in libgomp and the build of GCC succeed.
Strange. I do not know what's
