[Bug libobjc/78697] --with-target-bdw-gc-include shouldn't be required to be per multilib

2017-01-18 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78697 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libobjc/78697] --with-target-bdw-gc-include shouldn't be required to be per multilib

2017-01-18 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78697 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose --- Author: doko Date: Wed Jan 18 15:48:54 2017 New Revision: 244579 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244579=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-18 Matthias Klose PR libobjc/78697 *

[Bug libobjc/78697] --with-target-bdw-gc-include shouldn't be required to be per multilib

2016-12-30 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78697 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg02003.html

[Bug libobjc/78697] --with-target-bdw-gc-include shouldn't be required to be per multilib

2016-12-07 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78697 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- well, it does make sense when the header files differ, however that is not the case for the gc header files afaics. Is this what you are looking for? The fallback directory should not override the values