https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.4|12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|11.4
--- Comment #10 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk. It can't be backported without also backporting r12-1068 to fix
PR100368.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c564e813c0626802e5bfb066c094933d5e6a774
commit r12-4448-g2c564e813c0626802e5bfb066c094933d5e6a774
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from TC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #6 from Barry Revzin ---
The "real" answer is allowing constexpr placement new, but that obviously
doesn't help you right now.
But I think the helpful answer is that you can add a constructor to your
storage like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> > We might first need to implement P2231 (for constexpr optional) before this
> > function can be properly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> We might first need to implement P2231 (for constexpr optional) before this
> function can be properly constexpr.
Implemented in r12-4389
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> We might first need to implement P2231 (for constexpr optional) before this
> function can be properly constexpr.
I have a patch for that, but it's not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
12 matches
Mail list logo