[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-11-26 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-11-26 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3f135a50c3dd7fc04252e17d7fbb08ca95aa9a5 commit r10-10307-gb3f135a50c3dd7fc04252e17d7fbb08ca95aa9a5 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-10-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c2eea2841aa2ca165b9055763fffcee5008bf83 commit r11-9105-g9c2eea2841aa2ca165b9055763fffcee5008bf83 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-10-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63d91069ba8a9f1dc8bfa56ebfc10903a999f1cb commit r11-9104-g63d91069ba8a9f1dc8bfa56ebfc10903a999f1cb Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-09-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think that constructor could just be deleted, but it's fixed now. Thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-09-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fa2c5a695bb962ffcf8abed49f69cdcc59d0e61 commit r12-3637-g1fa2c5a695bb962ffcf8abed49f69cdcc59d0e61 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-09-16 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 --- Comment #4 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #3) > The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:734b2c2eedca50d966e22540fc136158c3633393 > > commit

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-09-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-09-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:734b2c2eedca50d966e22540fc136158c3633393 commit r12-3592-g734b2c2eedca50d966e22540fc136158c3633393 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-09-10 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 --- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 --- In addition, the uses-allocator construction version also missing constexpr specifier, but I don't know if this is intentional. #include #include struct O { using allocator_type = std::allocator; O() =

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-09-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-10

[Bug libstdc++/102270] std::tuple<>::swap missing constexpr specifier

2021-09-10 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102270 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- This is missing from r278331.