https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for 13.3 and 14.1 so far, I still plan to backport this to gcc-12 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71e941b0e329d3a316e465569c92e08788a68614
commit r13-8771-g71e941b0e329d3a316e465569c92e08788a68614
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07e03761a7fc1626a6a74ed957e117f56981558c
commit r14-9551-g07e03761a7fc1626a6a74ed957e117f56981558c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This seems to fix it:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.tcc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.tcc
@@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
// sqrt(pi / 2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359
--- Comment #2 from Angelo Landi ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Due to an integer overflow
>
> Hmm, I don't think this is an integer overflow but rather due to wrapping.
> Yes there is a difference as overflow is undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
> Due to an integer overflow
Hmm, I don't think this is an integer overflow but rather due to wrapping. Yes
there is a difference as overflow is undefined behavior while wrapping is
defined.
