https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612
--- Comment #36 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Is there anything left to "fix" here?
Fully dynamic string should help the COW string cases.
The new __cxx11::basic_string fully supports C++11 allocators and so should
work with allocators using "fancy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612
Bug 16612 depends on bug 24882, which changed state.
Bug 24882 Summary: [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612
--- Comment #35 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-08
13:59:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> For what it's worth, it appears as if I was just bitten by this issue in a
> slightly different context.
You haven't given enough detail to know if it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612
j.scheid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||julians37 at googlemail dot
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|paolo dot carlini at oracle |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|dot com
--- Comment #33 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-14 10:01 ---
FYI:
-fvisibility is broken on 4.0.x.
If you want to use this option, I suggest you use 4.2.x. Both the compiler and
library can handle it, or should be able to handle it.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #32 from choe dot hwanjin at gmail dot com 2006-12-14 07:30
---
(From update of attachment 12801)
Something similar happens when I use GCC option -fvisibility=hidden.
I made a DSO which uses basic_string<>.
And the main function created a basic_string instance with default
--- Comment #31 from choe dot hwanjin at gmail dot com 2006-12-14 07:29
---
Created an attachment (id=12801)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12801&action=view)
basic_string test code with visibility option
Something similar happens when I use GCC option -fvisibility
--- Comment #30 from gerrit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-05 22:09 ---
It crashes on Cygwin too. I wonder if --enable-fully-dynamic-string should be
the default when building on platforms where it is known to fail without this
option.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-28 08:58
---
Subject: Bug 16612
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 08:58:36
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog README acconfig.h acinclude
10 matches
Mail list logo