[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

2018-08-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612 --- Comment #36 from Jonathan Wakely --- Is there anything left to "fix" here? Fully dynamic string should help the COW string cases. The new __cxx11::basic_string fully supports C++11 allocators and so should work with allocators using "fancy

[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

2015-03-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612 Bug 16612 depends on bug 24882, which changed state. Bug 24882 Summary: [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

2012-04-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612 --- Comment #35 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-08 13:59:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) > For what it's worth, it appears as if I was just bitten by this issue in a > slightly different context. You haven't given enough detail to know if it's

[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

2012-04-05 Thread julians37 at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612 j.scheid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||julians37 at googlemail dot

[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

2010-01-20 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
-- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|paolo dot carlini at oracle |unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dot com

[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

2006-12-14 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #33 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-14 10:01 --- FYI: -fvisibility is broken on 4.0.x. If you want to use this option, I suggest you use 4.2.x. Both the compiler and library can handle it, or should be able to handle it. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

2006-12-13 Thread choe dot hwanjin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #32 from choe dot hwanjin at gmail dot com 2006-12-14 07:30 --- (From update of attachment 12801) Something similar happens when I use GCC option -fvisibility=hidden. I made a DSO which uses basic_string<>. And the main function created a basic_string instance with default

[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

2006-12-13 Thread choe dot hwanjin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #31 from choe dot hwanjin at gmail dot com 2006-12-14 07:29 --- Created an attachment (id=12801) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12801&action=view) basic_string test code with visibility option Something similar happens when I use GCC option -fvisibility

[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

2005-10-05 Thread gerrit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #30 from gerrit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-05 22:09 --- It crashes on Cygwin too. I wonder if --enable-fully-dynamic-string should be the default when building on platforms where it is known to fail without this option. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

2004-09-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-28 08:58 --- Subject: Bug 16612 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 08:58:36 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog README acconfig.h acinclude