[Bug libstdc++/17243] Test failures due to missing C99 symbols

2005-01-27 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-27 15:52 --- Fixed both hpux and solaris (as reported privately by Eric, thanks!) with: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-01/msg01023.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/17243] Test failures due to missing C99 symbols

2004-12-20 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-12-20 20:02 --- *** Bug 19086 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17243

[Bug libstdc++/17243] Test failures due to missing C99 symbols

2004-11-13 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13 15:37 --- Present on all versions of Solaris up to (and including) version 9. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/17243] Test failures due to missing C99 symbols

2004-11-02 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-03 00:18 --- Simple grep: /include/std/std_complex.h: __complex_arg(__complex__ float __z) { return __builtin_cargf(__z); } Simple theory: on targets without __builtin_cargf, cargf gets referenced with this call.

[Bug libstdc++/17243] Test failures due to missing C99 symbols

2004-11-02 Thread gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-11-03 00:28 --- Subject: Re: Test failures due to missing C99 symbols bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Simple grep: | | /include/std/std_complex.h: __complex_arg(__complex__ float __z) { return |