[Bug libstdc++/18053] __gnu_cxx::hash_setA uses return type of A::operator() instead of A

2005-01-22 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-22 09:16 --- Ok.. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/18053] __gnu_cxx::hash_setA uses return type of A::operator() instead of A

2004-11-01 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-01 23:25 --- Created an attachment (id=7455) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7455action=view) testcase corrected test case, set/hash_set/map/hash_map. --

[Bug libstdc++/18053] __gnu_cxx::hash_setA uses return type of A::operator() instead of A

2004-11-01 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-01 23:27 --- I think this is INVALID. I've attached a corrected test case for set/map/hash_set/hash_map. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18053

[Bug libstdc++/18053] __gnu_cxx::hash_setA uses return type of A::operator() instead of A

2004-10-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |libstdc++ http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18053

[Bug libstdc++/18053] __gnu_cxx::hash_setA uses return type of A::operator() instead of A

2004-10-19 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-10-19 12:08 --- More about this issue later, only two quick remarks: 1- Current mainline doesn't even compile the testcase, due to type mismatches in the allocator caused by the overloaded operators. 2- In any case, it's unlikely