--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-22 09:16
---
Ok..
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-01 23:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=7455)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7455action=view)
testcase
corrected test case, set/hash_set/map/hash_map.
--
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-01 23:27 ---
I think this is INVALID. I've attached a corrected test case for
set/map/hash_set/hash_map.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18053
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18053
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-10-19 12:08 ---
More about this issue later, only two quick remarks:
1- Current mainline doesn't even compile the testcase, due to type mismatches
in the allocator caused by the overloaded operators.
2- In any case, it's unlikely