https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I will remove this extension completely for GCC 10.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
I agree, let's deprecate it for 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No matter where I put the deprecated attribute or how many times I instantiate
the class template I can't get any deprecated warning. (PR 33911, but it
usually warns if you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 29 20:43:44 2014
New Revision: 207280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207280root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/21609
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-16 17:51
---
Yes, sorry ;) (12.8). Summary fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|array_allocator vs
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16
18:24 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Templates are never copy constructors.
Just to clarify just in case some mistakes this for something different.
template member functions cannot be considered a copy constructor.
10 matches
Mail list logo
