--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-07-26 09:48
---
Fixed for 4.0.2.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26
09:46 ---
Subject: Bug 23053
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-26 09:46:23
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25
22:46 ---
Subject: Bug 23053
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-25 22:46:48
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/inclu
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-07-25 08:39
---
Ok, thanks.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse
--- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-07-25 07:52
---
Apologises, I misread the problem. Ignore my previous comment. Yes, I agree
that find_node (which is a
private function) should be const. An identical problem exists calling
equal_range
--
http://gcc.gn
--- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-07-25 07:46
---
Actually according to the TR1 spec (n1745 at least), there should be a
non-const version which returns an
iterator, and a const version which returns a const_iterator.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--- Additional Comments From evilalias at hotmail dot com 2005-07-25 02:08
---
Created an attachment (id=9356)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9356&action=view)
Preprocessed test case (112 KB)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23053