--- Comment #22 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 11:37 ---
This is closed as gcjx is dead.
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-10-24 06:18
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
pcarlini at suse dot de [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Gaby, any news about this issue?
gcjx has been declared dead. I never got to have the issue fixed.
So, it is up to
--- Comment #20 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-17 09:28 ---
Gaby, any news about this issue?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25608
--- Comment #18 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-17 18:33 ---
is this still an active issue, or was it indicative of some temporary or
transient thing in the gcc sources?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25608
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| is this still an active issue, or was it indicative of some temporary or
| transient thing in the gcc sources?
Now, I get a segmentation fault -- instead of dead lock.
gcjx is compiled with mainline GCC/g++.
I was trying to compile
--- Comment #19 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-03-17 23:37
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| is this still an active issue, or was it indicative of some temporary or
| transient thing in the gcc sources?
--- Comment #14 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 16:32 ---
Gaby, here's the one thing that I can think of that changed between 3.4.x and
mainline/4.1 in this code path:
2005-10-10 Ian Lance Taylor ian@airs.com
PR libstdc++/13583
*
--- Comment #15 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 16:35 ---
ps tom this kind of organization for compiling looks dreamy:
#20 0x400afc18 in compiler::do_analyze_unit (this=0x8055248, unit=0x8089dc0)
at exception.hh:63
#21 0x400afebf in compiler::semantic_analysis
--- Comment #16 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-01-26 16:44 ---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Gaby, here's the one thing that I can think of that changed between 3.4.x and
| mainline/4.1 in this code path:
Thank you
--- Comment #17 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-01-26 16:45 ---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| ps tom this kind of organization for compiling looks dreamy:
Yup! I dream of when other GCC parts would be similarly
--- Comment #13 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 18:23 ---
FWIW I suspect there is undefined code in gcjx.
For instance I think the constant evaluation code assumes
-fwrapv behavior. There could well be other undefined code,
but I don't know of any.
That said, it seems
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 04:17 ---
This sounds more like a libstdc++ issue rather than a front-end or optimizer
issue.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 04:33 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Before reclassifying, it would useful to provide data. If you cannot,
please move on something else. You're not being helpful here.
Since this is reproducible from 4.0 upwards and it is
--- Comment #9 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-12-31 04:44
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| (In reply to comment #7)
| Before reclassifying, it would useful to provide data. If you cannot,
| please move
--- Comment #10 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-12-31 05:07
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This seems very related to PR 12658.
it was fixed in all branches.
-- Gaby
--
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 05:46
---
Hmm, can you try the following C++ program and see if it works for you:
#include sstream
int main(void)
{
for(int j=0;j1000;j++){
std::ostringstream a;
char *a1 = aa;
for(int i
--- Comment #12 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-12-31 05:56
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hmm, can you try the following C++ program and see if it works for you:
It works for me at -O0, -O1, -O2, -O3
17 matches
Mail list logo
