--- Comment #15 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-08-29 10:23
---
*** Bug 45442 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-08-13 18:39
---
*** Bug 45279 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-06 09:36 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
In C90 strtod does not say anything specifically about inf, etc. However,
it
does say:
In other than the C locale, additional implementation-defined subject
sequence forms may be
--- Comment #12 from ian at airs dot com 2006-06-06 22:18 ---
At this web page:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1568.htm
I see this:
The formatted input functions shall support the additional conversion
specifications specified in C99 subclause 7.19.6.2.
--- Comment #13 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-06 22:36 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
At this web page:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1568.htm
I see this:
The formatted input functions shall support the additional conversion
specifications
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-05 21:16 ---
This is not a bug, but standard conforming behavior (have a look to the
specific sections in 22_locale describing in detail the parsing steps and the
grammar). I'm even more sure about that because we discussed the issue
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 22:39 ---
I don't think I agree.
27.6.1.2.2 says:
As in the case of the inserters, these extractors depend on the locales
num_get (22.2.2.1) object to perform
parsing the input stream data. The conversion occurs as if
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-05 22:45 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I don't think I agree.
27.6.1.2.2 says:
As in the case of the inserters, these extractors depend on the locales
num_get (22.2.2.1) object to perform
parsing the input stream data. The
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 22:48 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Read in detail Stage 2, 22.2.2.1.2, p8, + the grammar in 22.2.3.1, p2. + Icc
(Dinkum) + Rogueware (in the person of Martin) agree. Really, given the
current
standard we cannot parse
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 22:49 ---
Please take this up with the C++ standard since the two stages conflict.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-05 22:55 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Please take this up with the C++ standard since the two stages conflict.
22.2.2.1.2, p5, does not conflict, because the conversion using %g happens at
the end of Stage 2, p9, on the accumulated
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-05 22:57 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Please take this up with the C++ standard since the two stages conflict.
22.2.2.1.2, p5, does not conflict, because the conversion using %g happens at
the end of
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 23:04 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
It just seems bogus that it says %g and then goes on to do something different
and not to take into account that strlod is allowed more than just the
characters specified.
The other problem
--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-05 23:15 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #6)
It just seems bogus that it says %g and then goes on to do something different
and not to take into account that strlod is allowed more than just the
characters
--- Comment #10 from ian at airs dot com 2006-06-06 04:11 ---
In C90 strtod does not say anything specifically about inf, etc. However, it
does say:
In other than the C locale, additional implementation-defined subject
sequence forms may be accepted.
In any case, to me this is a
16 matches
Mail list logo
