[Bug libstdc++/33293] inlining std::inner_product()

2007-09-04 Thread simon dot marshall at misys dot com
--- Comment #4 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2007-09-04 08:01 --- Many thanks for the quick response. Any chance it could make it into 4.2.2? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33293

[Bug libstdc++/33293] inlining std::inner_product()

2007-09-04 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-04 08:41 --- The patch itself is trivial but in our experience changing the inlining patterns can have far reaching and unpredictable fall-outs. Thus, better not touching the release branches, sorry. --

[Bug libstdc++/33293] inlining std::inner_product()

2007-09-04 Thread simon dot marshall at misys dot com
--- Comment #6 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2007-09-04 08:43 --- OK, thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33293

[Bug libstdc++/33293] inlining std::inner_product()

2007-09-03 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-03 17:20 --- Note, in GCC any -Ox, x 3 is identical to -O3. Anyway, I think we can safely add inline to std::accumulate and std::inner_product. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/33293] inlining std::inner_product()

2007-09-03 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-03 17:48 --- Subject: Bug 33293 Author: paolo Date: Mon Sep 3 17:48:31 2007 New Revision: 128053 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=128053 Log: 2007-09-03 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libstdc++/33293] inlining std::inner_product()

2007-09-03 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-03 17:50 --- Fixed for 4.3.0. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED