[Bug libstdc++/33613] compilation inconsistency upper_bound vs lower_bound with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2007-10-02 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-02 09:17 --- On it. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/33613] compilation inconsistency upper_bound vs lower_bound with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2007-10-02 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 00:34 --- Subject: Bug 33613 Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 3 00:34:40 2007 New Revision: 128974 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=128974 Log: 2007-10-03 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libstdc++/33613] compilation inconsistency upper_bound vs lower_bound with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2007-10-02 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-03 00:35 --- Fixed for 4.3.0. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/33613] compilation inconsistency upper_bound vs lower_bound with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2007-10-01 Thread leo dot moisio at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from leo dot moisio at gmail dot com 2007-10-01 19:55 --- Created an attachment (id=14281) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14281action=view) The preprocessed source as created by g++ -v -save-temps -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG test.cc --

[Bug libstdc++/33613] compilation inconsistency upper_bound vs lower_bound with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2007-10-01 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-01 21:26 --- Yes. In short, the debug-mode checks must implement the detailed requirements of DR270. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#270 In practice, probably we need a dual version of