[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-10-10 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-11 01:26 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors) Looking at the testresults, it appears to have been introduced between 128587 and 128594 in September. The only patch

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-10-08 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-08 18:57 --- So the problem is new, right? Has it to do with the recent fixes for the deadlock bug? -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-10-08 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-08 19:32 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors) --- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-08 18:57 --- So the problem is new, right? Has it to do

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-10-08 Thread dougkwan at google dot com
--- Comment #3 from dougkwan at google dot com 2007-10-08 19:50 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors) That's strange. I am looking at it. I ran the libstdc++ testsuite before and did not see this problem. -Doug 8 Oct 2007 19:32:42

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-10-08 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-08 20:10 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors) That's strange. I am looking at it. I ran the libstdc++ testsuite before and did not see this problem. This is

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-10-08 Thread dougkwan at google dot com
--- Comment #5 from dougkwan at google dot com 2007-10-08 22:35 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors) I only tested in Linux. -Doug 8 Oct 2007 20:10:51 -, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ---

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-10-08 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-08 23:01 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors) I only tested in Linux. This was not introduced by your change. The problem is the use of an C99 extension (long long

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-10-08 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-08 23:35 --- Let's remove Doug from CC, then, and thank him for his prompt feedback... -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added