[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 08:24 --- Are you using the same glibc on x86_64 and ia64? The two failing testcases (cons/7.cc and members/char/2.cc, the other are implied) are essentially the same: something is different on that ia64 machine about

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 08:36 --- The only thing I remember was fr_FR locale changing some stuff and Fedora backing out that change as it was done upstream too late in the cycle to get feedback from the French community. --

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 08:47 --- Yes, I'm not sure is the same issue. Anyway, the problem can only be in this idea: _M_data-_M_thousands_sep = *(__nl_langinfo_l(THOUSANDS_SEP,

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 08:50 --- By the way, yes the fr_FR locale is heavily used in those tests... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38411

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 08:55 --- I suspect in the localedata of fr_FR, the thousands separator may have changed in some glibc from ' ' (0x20) to '\0'. Jakub can you confirm that? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38411

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 09:10 --- Forcing , thousands separator when none should be used is very weird. Does C++ standard mandate that behavior? means thousands shouldn't be separated by any separator. In most cases such locales also have grouping

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 09:13 --- To reply to #c8, it changed the other way around, from to U0020 in April 2008. But as I said, Fedora 9, which shipped glibc 2.9, was backing out these changes (Fedora 10 has them already). --

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 09:16 --- (In reply to comment #9) Forcing , thousands separator when none should be used is very weird. Is the same C locale has. We only want consistency, see 38368. Does C++ standard mandate that behavior?

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 09:17 --- (In reply to comment #10) To reply to #c8, it changed the other way around, from to U0020 in April 2008. But as I said, Fedora 9, which shipped glibc 2.9, was backing out these changes (Fedora 10 has

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 09:38 --- I see you already disable grouping if it is empty, good. If _M_thousands_sep must be a single _CharT, then for char I guess you should transliterate it if the string is longer than one character. Either by using

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #14 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 09:42 --- (In reply to comment #13) If _M_thousands_sep must be a single _CharT, then for char I guess you should transliterate it if the string is longer than one character. Either by using glibc transliteration

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
-- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |paolo dot carlini at oracle |dot org

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 09:48 --- Well, if you take first byte from a multibyte sequence, then it is IMNSHO something that should be solved for 4.4 too. For say ru_RU.UTF-8 that means you emit invalid UTF-8 if you separate digits with say '\xc2',

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #16 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 09:51 --- (In reply to comment #15) Well, if you take first byte from a multibyte sequence, then it is IMNSHO something that should be solved for 4.4 too. For say ru_RU.UTF-8 that means you emit invalid UTF-8 if

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #17 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 09:54 --- Created an attachment (id=16831) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16831action=view) Draft Draft patch using is_IS instead of fr_FR. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38411

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #18 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 09:55 --- HJ, can you test it and report? Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38411

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread tsyvarev at ispras dot ru
--- Comment #19 from tsyvarev at ispras dot ru 2008-12-05 11:08 --- It seems that C++ standard contains contradiction about thousands separator in C locale: 22.2.3.1, p1 says: The instantiations required in Table 51 (22.1.1.1.1), namely numpunctwchar_t and numpunctchar, provide

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 13:09 --- Subject: Bug 38411 Author: paolo Date: Fri Dec 5 13:07:53 2008 New Revision: 142472 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142472 Log: 2008-12-05 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #21 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-05 13:09 --- Fixed. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-05 05:25 --- Revision 142439 is the cause. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/38411] [4.4 Regression] Revision 142439 caused 22_locale/locale/cons/7.cc execution test

2008-12-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-05 05:34 --- Jakub, there was a similar problem with locale on Linux before. Do you remember it? -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added