--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-30 11:30
---
Why don't you just use SVN? Also, is this failure new, or not? As far as I know
could even be months old...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40912
--- Comment #2 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30
11:49 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Why don't you just use SVN? Also, is this failure new, or not? As far as I
know
could even be months old...
I am digging a hole for myself here - am currently building svn (and
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-30 12:41
---
Well, the file itself didn't *exist* in 4.3.x and 4.4.x...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40912
--- Comment #4 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30
12:57 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Well, the file itself didn't *exist* in 4.3.x and 4.4.x...
Oh, indeed... have been trying to build subversion for the last few hours just
so that I can try last night's instead of
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-30 15:41
---
As a side note, I want to mention that we are very close to finally fixing
c/448 for 4.5.0. Then, any problem related to stdint.h will disappear.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40912
--- Comment #6 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30
15:58 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
As a side note, I want to mention that we are very close to finally fixing
c/448 for 4.5.0. Then, any problem related to stdint.h will disappear.
What is 'c/448'? I have spent
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-30 16:26
---
Do you want something to click? PR448
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40912
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-07-30 16:30 ---
Subject: Re: 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile
bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
As a side note, I want to mention that we are very close
--- Comment #9 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-30
16:54 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Do you want something to click? PR448
Oh, I didn't expect bug id that old to be relevant - I thought c/448 might be
short for bug XX448 so I tried bug 40448 :-).
(In reply to
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-07-30 19:28
---
Subject: Re: 4.5 weekly snapshot: failed to pre-compile
bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net wrote:
I can't say about the others alpha*-dec-osf[45]*,
--- Comment #11 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-31
01:50 ---
gcc-4.5-20090409 (svn r145863) breaks at the same place; gcc-4.5-20090402 (svn
r145482) breaks later at
-
make all-am
make[4]: Entering directory
--- Comment #12 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-07-31
02:14 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
It looks like 4.5 will be dead-on-arrival alpha*-dec-osf[45]*, unless I fix
this myself...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40912
12 matches
Mail list logo
