[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-12 18:36:03 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Feb 12 18:35:59 2011 New Revision: 170084 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170084 Log: 2011-02-12 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-10 10:05:26 UTC --- BTW, it would be good to have testcases covering all headers compiled with -fno-operator-names to make sure it doesn't reappear. Perhaps with turning off PCH

[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-10 10:12:12 UTC --- Good idea. I didn't get through my whole TODO list yesterday, so didn't fix this yet

[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-10 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-02-10 10:25:18 UTC --- I also think it makes sense, we already have the right places for such tests: testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998 and testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++200x

[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-10 22:40:58 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Thu Feb 10 22:40:53 2011 New Revision: 170026 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170026 Log: 2011-02-10 Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-10 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-02-11 00:34:57 UTC --- By the way, lately we have available { dg-add-options no_pch }

[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09 14:32:50 UTC --- I've also just noticed the manual for -fno-operator-names could do with some improvement: those alternative tokens aren't technically keywords, they're

[Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers

2011-02-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-02-09 15:10:39 UTC --- Thanks Jon, for sure that 'or' hasn't been added on purpose.