[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-24 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-23 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #21 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 15:32:42 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 23 15:32:39 2011 New Revision: 174073 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174073 Log: PR c++/49058 *

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 21:23:12 UTC --- It would be wrong though, consider: struct F { int operator(); void operator() const; }; the decltype would detect the return type as 'int' but the

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 21:29:56 UTC --- For a complete example: struct F { int operator()() const { return 0; } void operator()() const { }; }; int main() { auto const b = std::bind( F() );

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 21:24:16 UTC --- Duh, sorry, that should have been struct F { int operator()(); void operator()() const; };

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 21:32:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) For a complete example: struct F { int operator()() const { return 0; } void operator()() const { }; sigh, I should

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-22 21:47:04 UTC --- Ok, let's make sure to have something similar in the testsuite. And, well, I still believe a tangle of auto return types shouldn't be really necessary

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-22 22:20:24 UTC --- Sorry, hit return inadvertently. Anyway, the idea would be, instead of just writing: const _Functor writing something like: typename

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-22 22:17:10 UTC --- What about creating an artificially dependent context, thus amenable to SFINAE, like: // Call as const templatetypename... _Args, typename _Result =

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-22 22:30:55 UTC --- This is something which actually passes the testsuite, and the tests here and the new test explained by Jon. Maybe something even more clean along the

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-22 22:52:13 UTC --- With enable_if becomes a tad more concise. /// Index: include/std/functional

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 23:09:06 UTC --- nice trick, if that passes the testsuite I'd check it in

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #18 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 00:05:29 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 23 00:05:24 2011 New Revision: 174048 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174048 Log: 2011-05-22

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-23 00:10:24 UTC --- Thanks Jon. Thus, library issue fixed in mainline and 4_6-branch. Jason, I think you can safely commit the compiler change in mainline...

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-22 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 --- Comment #19 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 00:09:00 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 23 00:08:52 2011 New Revision: 174049 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174049 Log: 2011-05-22

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-19 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-19 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

2011-05-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED