https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #43 from steve 100adult at armyspy dot com ---
http://www.10ults.com/escorts-in-usa.html
thanks for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
steve 100adult at armyspy dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||100adult at armyspy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
Wellamjames feritzpowell at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||feritzpowell
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
Elizbath Martin elizbathjames at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
Jmaescraig margaretnemon at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||margaretnemon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
tysonroy tysonroy at yopmail dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tysonroy at yopmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
jandyu rata amandalionard at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amandalionard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
brett davis dparker1324 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #35 from albcl111 muhammadali.ca4 at gmail dot com 2012-12-21
11:58:37 UTC ---
Well said….positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked
to check out new stuff you weblog
airlinesplanet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #34 from albcl111 muhammadali.ca4 at gmail dot com 2012-12-21
06:46:07 UTC ---
positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check
out new stuff you weblog
AIHL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
albcl111 muhammadali.ca4 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
Tim Parker ptim034 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ptim034 at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
DANISH DANISH8926536 at GMAIL dot COM changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||DANISH8926536 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #27 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-09-22
09:25:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
[builtins to reverse the bit order]
I think a separate Bugzilla requesting as an enhancement such intrinsics would
be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #28 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-22
09:49:18 UTC ---
I think we should. Can you do that? Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #29 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-09-22
10:29:07 UTC ---
See Bug 50481 about bit-reversal builtins (and feel free to add details there).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé de...@the-user.org 2011-09-22
13:39:22 UTC ---
Sorry, thank you for creating the feature-request.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #26 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-08-31 15:23:56 UTC ---
Various processors have an instruction to reverse the bit order in a word
(ARMv6T2 and later have RBIT, for example, and C6X has BITR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|vectorbool comparison |vectorbool
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé de...@the-user.org 2011-08-30
23:25:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 25143
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25143
bits/stl_vector.h patch
moved operator== and operator inside class,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé de...@the-user.org 2011-08-30
23:30:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 25144
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25144
b
More efficient (non representative benchmark!) implementation of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé de...@the-user.org 2011-08-30
23:30:36 UTC ---
Added basic patch…
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-30
23:34:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
moved operator== and operator inside class, because I want to overload them
huh, why is that needed? it's not acceptable anyway,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé de...@the-user.org 2011-08-30
23:56:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #14)
moved operator== and operator inside class, because I want to overload them
huh, why is that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-31
00:04:36 UTC ---
I'm wondering if processing an unsigned long at a time wouldn't be a step in
the right direction. Then, a compiler intrinsics would be the right place
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-31
00:26:49 UTC ---
Largely irrelevant here, but partial specialization of function templates
simply does not exist. We have been talking about adding an overload like:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé de...@the-user.org 2011-08-31
00:30:58 UTC ---
It would indeed be nice to have such a builtin function (8, 16, 32, 64 bit
reversing), currently there is none in gcc, only bytewise reversing iirc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31
00:33:52 UTC ---
Can't you do ~a ~b ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé de...@the-user.org 2011-08-31
00:34:28 UTC ---
@Paolo
Okay, I am sometimes overcautious with function-templates, because I often had
a lot of errors because of partial specialisation when it was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé de...@the-user.org 2011-08-31
00:39:57 UTC ---
@Andrew
Nope:
1001 0001 (lexicographically)
1001 0001 (as little-endian)
0110 1110 (as little-endian)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #25 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-31
00:56:42 UTC ---
I think a separate Bugzilla requesting as an enhancement such intrinsics would
be certainly appropriate. I'm sure other code could exploit those.
31 matches
Mail list logo