http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-15 10:49:23 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 15 10:49:20 2011
New Revision: 181382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181382
Log:
2011-11-15 Jason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-15 10:49:04 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 15 10:49:00 2011
New Revision: 181381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181381
Log:
2011-11-15 Jason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
Jason Dick dickphd at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25823|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-15
11:04:51 UTC ---
Thanks, but please, instead of doing this here, for this specific testcase,
please collaborate with Ed at integrating this code in the testsuite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
--- Comment #12 from Jason Dick dickphd at gmail dot com 2011-11-15 11:08:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Thanks, but please, instead of doing this here, for this specific testcase,
please collaborate with Ed at integrating this code in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
--- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-15
11:11:47 UTC ---
If we do this as part of the general testsuite infrastructure we can also
afford having a little more code, separate out-of-line functions, etc. But
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
--- Comment #14 from Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2011-11-15
12:48:06 UTC ---
I'm glad to see renewed interest in this. I wasn't sure if anyone else had
used these routines ;-)
Anyway, one thing I would like us to look at is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
--- Comment #2 from Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2011-11-15
05:17:45 UTC ---
Jason,
You are right!
Thank you.
We'll want some test cases. I was testing against GSL but they didn't have
orthogonal polynomials at the time and this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
--- Comment #3 from Jason Dick dickphd at gmail dot com 2011-11-15 05:48:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 25823
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25823
Test case for hermite(), requires GSL
This test verifies the Hermite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
--- Comment #4 from Jason Dick dickphd at gmail dot com 2011-11-15 05:59:27
UTC ---
I have attached a tiny program which I used to test these polynomials. I
believe the test is entirely robust provided the first two Hermite polynomials
are
14 matches
Mail list logo
