[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-18 22:33:19 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sun Dec 18 22:33:15 2011 New Revision: 182461 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182461 Log: PR libstdc++/51540

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-17 13:23:11 UTC --- There are good books by Josuttis and Austern, or the SGI docs online. Our docs could definitely improved, but there are other ways to get the info you want,

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-17 13:26:04 UTC --- Or of course you can look at the code

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-17 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #17 from Christopher Yeleighton giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl 2011-12-17 17:05:58 UTC --- The SGI documentation clarifies all issues well enough indeed. I wonder whether it would be a good thing to put a reference to SGI in the

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-16 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #12 from Christopher Yeleighton giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl 2011-12-16 18:59:31 UTC --- Additionally, and also for the default operator form, it is unclear what the result is when the operator is noncommutative. That is, whether

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-16 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-16 20:16:16 UTC --- Up to Jon to decide which details he wants to add to the docs, but please always keep in mind that in the areas where the behavior isn't implementation

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-16 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #14 from Christopher Yeleighton giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl 2011-12-16 20:31:24 UTC --- I would rather prefer to be able to use gcc (as a software developer) while not having the ISO standard, which is 1) unreadable with an unarmed

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3 ---

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-15 09:50:04 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Thu Dec 15 09:49:59 2011 New Revision: 182359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182359 Log: PR libstdc++/51540

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-14 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-14 11:17:44 UTC --- Thanks for the docs, Jon.