[Bug libstdc++/52764] Including cstdint after stdint.h fails to define limit macros

2012-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/52764] Including cstdint after stdint.h fails to define limit macros

2012-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-27 12:38:48 UTC --- I guess we should simply implement in stdint-wrap.h and stdint-gcc.h what Joseph recommended. It seems safer to me to conditionalize the change on

[Bug libstdc++/52764] Including cstdint after stdint.h fails to define limit macros

2012-04-07 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-07 16:06:46 UTC --- My previous suggestion stands of having the compiler predefine __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS, whether for C++11 or

[Bug libstdc++/52764] Including cstdint after stdint.h fails to define limit macros

2012-03-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/52764] Including cstdint after stdint.h fails to define limit macros

2012-03-29 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at

[Bug libstdc++/52764] Including cstdint after stdint.h fails to define limit macros

2012-03-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-29 10:25:22 UTC --- Joseph, I was just about to file a glibc bug, let me know if you want that done. Glibc's stdint.h (and GCC's stdint-gcc.h) must unconditionally define the