[Bug libstdc++/56551] A faster implementation of std::function

2022-09-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56551 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- As I just wrote on the duplicate bug: I've looked into this and I don't think it can be done without an ABI break. Objects constructed in old code compiled by an older GCC would still have a null pointer,

[Bug libstdc++/56551] A faster implementation of std::function

2022-09-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56551 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rockeet at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/56551] A faster implementation of std::function

2013-03-09 Thread malteskarupke at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56551 malteskarupke at web dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||malteskarupke at web

[Bug libstdc++/56551] A faster implementation of std::function

2013-03-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56551 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06 16:24:20 UTC --- I've only glanced at the code but it's good to see you support passing an Allocator to the constructor (though it should use std::allocator_traits to