http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58815
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58815
--- Comment #16 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 23 11:48:26 2013
New Revision: 203956
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-23 Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/58815
* includ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58815
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini ---
A maintainer is also needed in order to *categorize* those potential issues and
plan the work: for example C++11 (+ C++14), which are the primary standards
which we are implementing, don't know about decimal,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58815
--- Comment #14 from ulf ---
i am happy with the explicit operator in std::decimal for now. however sooner
or later there will be another one who puzzels over other issues (traits,
limits, and all the functions that dont know std::decimal).
