https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a54ce8865a885bca5ab9c4aa6ec725cd13c09901
commit r12-5193-ga54ce8865a885bca5ab9c4aa6ec725cd13c09901
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jay Feldblum from comment #7)
> The caveat, not to pollute `bits/c++config` with `#include really */>`. Are there more caveats to be aware of?
No, that's it. The additional overhead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
Jay Feldblum changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yfeldblum at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.2 |9.2.1
--- Comment #6 from Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
--- Comment #5 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com ---
gcc-4.9.2-6.fc21.x86_64:
gcc-5.1.1-1.fc23.x86_64
#include debug/string
int main() { __gnu_debug::string s((const char *)0); }
g++ -o gcc59675b gcc59675b.C -Wall -g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com ---
It needs also some new #include as otherwise one may get:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:59:0,
from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, we've tried hard to stop polluting our headers with unnecessary includes,
so that would be a step backwards.
11 matches
Mail list logo