http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023
Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023
--- Comment #4 from Nevin Liber nevin at eviloverlord dot com ---
Good point about the Standard.
However, the current behavior for move assignment breaks the invariant of the
container, since the comparator is what enforces the insertion ordering
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023
--- Comment #1 from Nevin Liber nevin at eviloverlord dot com ---
Created attachment 32719
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32719action=edit
Test case using set showing the problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023
--- Comment #2 from Nevin Liber nevin at eviloverlord dot com ---
Also happens with multiset and multimap.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The standard forgot to say what should happen:
http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2227
