[Bug libstdc++/61791] [C++11] [constexpr] Additional overloads of std::real should be a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61791 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/61791] [C++11] [constexpr] Additional overloads of std::real should be a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61791 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jan 25 15:01:05 2017 New Revision: 244900 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244900=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/70607 make proj(T) and conj(T) return complex PR

[Bug libstdc++/61791] [C++11] [constexpr] Additional overloads of std::real should be a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61791 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-04-09 00:00:00 |2017-1-25 --- Comment #3 from

[Bug libstdc++/61791] [C++11] [constexpr] Additional overloads of std::real should be a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61791 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/61791] [C++11] [constexpr] Additional overloads of std::real should be a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61791 --- Comment #1 from Mitsuru Kariya kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com --- Sorry, the text which should be quoted was mistaken. According to C++11 standard 26.4.9[cmplx.over] paragraph 2, if either argument has type complexdouble, double, or an

[Bug libstdc++/61791] [C++11] [constexpr] Additional overloads of std::real should be a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61791 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|