https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Oct 9 18:17:28 2014
New Revision: 216047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216047root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61909
* include/std/functional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
std::functionvoid() f3((X())); // abort
This works now, but the lambda still needs to allocate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
--- Comment #4 from lukeocamden at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
(In reply to lukeocamden from comment #2)
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
This is by design.
I don't really follow - do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I already have a patch to do it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
--- Comment #2 from lukeocamden at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
This is by design.
I don't really follow - do you mean a consequence of the design, or does the
standard mandate copying/moving the object into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to lukeocamden from comment #2)
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
This is by design.
I don't really follow - do you mean a consequence of the design, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
