https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Mar 9 12:47:51 2015
New Revision: 221279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221279root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64467
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I suggest we just do this and get on with our lives:
index 8f71910..62d3740 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/28_regex/traits/char/isctype.cc
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It turns out I built with config/os/generic, since I do not configure
--with-newlib. It still is newlib though, and the dejagnu test knows
that. Impedance mismatch, kaboom.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Is this fixed at r220682 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In the POSIX (i.e. C) locale it should only be space and tab, but
implementing that when the target only has 8-bits for the ctype mask and
doesn't have a blank class is very
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #9)
To wit, at r220506 still see:
assertion !t.isctype('\n', t.lookup_classname(blank,
blank+sizeof(blank)/sizeof(blank[0])-1))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
To wit, at r220506 still see:
assertion !t.isctype('\n', t.lookup_classname(blank,
blank+sizeof(blank)/sizeof(blank[0])-1)) failed: file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #7 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Feb 4 09:24:56 2015
New Revision: 220392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220392root=gccview=rev
Log:
[PATCH][libstdc++][Testsuite] isctype test fails for newlib.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hm, considering the recently-applied patch at r220392, why does my autotester
still see these fail at r220396?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Like some of the BSDs, newlib provides a _B bitmask, but that does not
correspond to isblank so can't be used. The _B mask doesn't match the TAB
character, but isblank must match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
Almost certainly r217066.
Is this a newlib target? I would expect to see the same failure for all
newlib targets,
I verified that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #0)
I'll triage the revision range to exclude that.
It's one of 217063-217066, inclusive.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Almost certainly r217066.
Is this a newlib target? I would expect to see the same failure for all newlib
targets, as I defined std::ctype_base::blank to be equal to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
Almost certainly r217066.
Is this a newlib target?
Yes.
I would expect to see the same failure for all
newlib targets, as I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
21 matches
Mail list logo
