https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 15:31:07 2017
New Revision: 248233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/67440 make pretty printers work with GDB 7.6 again
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 18 14:35:18 2017
New Revision: 248211
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248211&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/67440 make pretty printers work with GDB 7.6 again
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Mar 16 14:11:48 2017
New Revision: 246196
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246196&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/67440 make pretty printers work with GDB 7.6 again
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this should be str(typ.unqualified()) otherwise it doesn't work on GDB
7.6:
Python Exception 'gdb.Type' object has no
attribute 'name'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
Doug Evans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
--- Comment #4 from devans at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: devans
Date: Mon Nov 16 23:46:56 2015
New Revision: 230444
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230444&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
PR libstdc++/67440
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
--- Comment #3 from devans at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: devans
Date: Mon Nov 16 21:32:26 2015
New Revision: 230437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/67440
* python/libstdcxx/v6/print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440
--- Comment #1 from Doug Evans ---
Created attachment 36288
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36288&action=edit
patch + testcase
This could use another set of eyes.