https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68869
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68869
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68869
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That's a recent edit to the draft, not yet part of the standard. I don't think
it was meant to change any behaviour, so I don't consider this a bug in
libstdc++ until I get some clarification whether this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68869
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Hmm, maybe the change was already in C++14. I'll still look into what was
intended, my memory is that it was just an editorial simplification.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68869
--- Comment #3 from TC ---
This was http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2005.
I don't think the S example breaks any rule in the pre-LWG2005 version, either.
That version requires that "P shall be convertible to value type", and
