[Bug libstdc++/69350] Don't define the C99 functions in -std=c++98 mode

2024-07-26 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69350 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'm inclined to close this one as WONTFIX. We should fix PR 11196 but I don't really care about this C++98 non-conformance now, and we've been doing it this way since before C++11 was even a thing. Definin

[Bug libstdc++/69350] Don't define the C99 functions in -std=c++98 mode

2024-07-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69350 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0) > (that won't be > possible for GNU/Linux unless/until we stop defining _GNU_SOURCE implicitly). Which is PR 11196 .

[Bug libstdc++/69350] Don't define the C99 functions in -std=c++98 mode

2016-11-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69350 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug libstdc++/69350] Don't define the C99 functions in -std=c++98 mode

2016-02-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69350 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The simplest solution might be something like: --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cmath +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cmath @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION return __built

[Bug libstdc++/69350] Don't define the C99 functions in -std=c++98 mode

2016-01-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69350 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|