[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2024-07-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.2|---

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2024-05-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.0|14.2 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2023-05-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |---

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2018-05-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |8.2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2017-01-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #4) > As I discussed with libc++ maintainer Eric Fiselier, it would be nice if > those functions called terminate() in the 'fatal' case instead. Then you at > least

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2017-01-24 Thread dimitry at andric dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 Dimitry Andric changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimitry at andric dot com --- Comment #

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2017-01-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2017-01-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Following discussion with one of the libc++ developers, we're considering some common API that would allow an aplication to globally turn those throws into aborts, so that redefining them would be unnecessa

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2017-01-24 Thread froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 Nathan Froyd changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

2016-01-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- It would also offer a better way for Firefox to do: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/memory/mozalloc/throw_gcc.h