[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

2018-05-16 Thread fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

2018-05-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- François, I think you fixed this for GCC 7.1, so should we close the bug report?

[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

2016-06-20 Thread fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 --- Comment #5 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Mon Jun 20 20:04:25 2016 New Revision: 237617 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237617=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-20 François Dumont PR libstdc++/71181

[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

2016-05-19 Thread fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 --- Comment #4 from François Dumont --- I guess you are talking about 61667. I think this report is quite new. At the moment reserve is implemented as proposed by the Standard but I agree with Alexey that demonstrated behavior is

[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

2016-05-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

2016-05-18 Thread riad93 at mail dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 Alexey Dmitriev changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.1.0 |6.1.0 --- Comment #2 from Alexey

[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

2016-05-18 Thread riad93 at mail dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Dmitriev --- in n4582 it's already not valid as they've change 23.2.5p15 to <=