https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ville.voutilainen at
gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
--- Comment #5 from Ville Voutilainen ---
There's a fairly decent chance, sure. :) I'll cook up a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
--- Comment #4 from Casey Carter ---
Any chance of applying this to 6-branch as well? This is breaking both range-v3
and cmcstl2 in a nasty and hard-to-workaround way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
--- Comment #2 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Wed Sep 21 16:48:35 2016
New Revision: 240322
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240322=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/77537
Implement LWG 2729 for pair.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
--- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01230.html