[Bug libstdc++/81808] 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX

2017-09-13 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 16:51:49 2017 New Revision: 252398 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252398=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/81808 skip test if reading directory doesn't fail PR

[Bug libstdc++/81808] 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX

2017-08-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/81808] 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX

2017-08-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Aug 11 00:14:57 2017 New Revision: 251041 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251041=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/81808 skip test if reading directory doesn't fail PR

[Bug libstdc++/81808] 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX

2017-08-10 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808 --- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn --- I have no objection to skipping the test on AIX if the test is not correct for AIX behavior.

[Bug libstdc++/81808] 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX

2017-08-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/81808] 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX

2017-08-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- On AIX reading the directory just reads the actual contents of the directory, i.e. the files contained in the directory. Maybe we should restrict the test to only run on targets where that read used to

[Bug libstdc++/81808] 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX

2017-08-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #3) > After in >> x, x appears to contain the value 0x02ff22770. That's just an indeterminate value because it was never initialized, and doesn't get written to by

[Bug libstdc++/81808] 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX

2017-08-10 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn --- After in >> x, x appears to contain the value 0x02ff22770.

[Bug libstdc++/81808] 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX

2017-08-10 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808 --- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn --- Created attachment 41967 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41967=edit Pre-processed source of testcase

[Bug libstdc++/81808] 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX

2017-08-10 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|