https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90102
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90102
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eca833b81289438ec5ae3ed4c77ffb49cfb65f34
commit r11-832-geca833b81289438ec5ae3ed4c77ffb49cfb65f34
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90102
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90102
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'll come back to this for GCC 10.
Slightly better (and not broken) patch:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/vector
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/vector
@@ -220,11 +220,11 @@ namespace __debug
~v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90102
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #4 from Jona
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90102
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm not sure if the original testcase is actually required to compile.
Implementations are allowed to add additional constructors, and they could take
an arbitrary type with a .clear() member.
But as a QoI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90102
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> A DEBUG::debug vector
s/DEBUG::debug vector/DEBUG::vector/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90102
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
