--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-12 10:43
---
Ok, so this is resolved as WONTFIX. Anyway, the PR remains in the database, of
course, and if somebody has ideas, partial solutions, whatever, those are of
course welcome, but let's not keep the PR in this
--- Comment #13 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2010-02-12 11:06
---
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour of valarray::apply method
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:22 PM, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
--- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-12 00:08
---
Gaby, any chance you can give me some guidance about this issue? What do you
think should we do now? The PR remained in limbo for way too much time, in my
opinion. Thanks in advance.
--
paolo dot carlini
--- Comment #10 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2010-02-12 00:20
---
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour of valarray::apply method
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:08 PM, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at
--- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-12 00:22
---
Thanks. Thus, would you support closing this as WONTFIX?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9679
pcarlini at suse dot de [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Gaby, could you please provide an update about this PR?
I think I gave all necessary information in the initial analysis I
made. Did you find something is out of date?
Personally, I would resolve this as won't fix, or at least suspend.
There
