https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21a7edf3a0cea656f2de834ea8320870496d5a2f
commit r8-10889-g21a7edf3a0cea656f2de834ea8320870496d5a2f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03e18a40070c6fe89397a73d85a38a99371cf8a1
commit r9-9424-g03e18a40070c6fe89397a73d85a38a99371cf8a1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:311c57f6d8f285d69e44bf94152c753900cb1a0a
commit r10-9474-g311c57f6d8f285d69e44bf94152c753900cb1a0a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Fixed on the trunk, probably needs backporting to 10/9/8 branches.
Yes, all three branches. It's been wrong since r249137 on trunk, which I
backported to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk, probably needs backporting to 10/9/8 branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efa64fcce12074dd542670feb02eaee53e810a30
commit r11-7340-gefa64fcce12074dd542670feb02eaee53e810a30
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We're in namespace std here so size_t doesn't need to be qualified, but
otherwise the patch is fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
static _GLIBCXX_CONSTEXPR bool
lt(const char_type& __c1, const char_type& __c2) _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
{
// LWG 467.
return (static_cast(__c1)
<
11 matches
Mail list logo