https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I mean that the test used in the library code is doing the right thing. I
haven't investigated whether the compiler is not handling the lookup correctly,
but I don't think there's a libstdc++ bug here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692
--- Comment #6 from Sergey Kaniskin ---
> Which seems correct to me. Users should not be overloading operator<< for
> types defined by the standard library anyway. You don't own vector so
> you don't get to say how it should be output to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> But by definition at this point operator << does not exist and is not
> considered as it is not found via ADL because both std::basic_ostream
> and std::vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Sergey Kaniskin from comment #3)
> I was unsure whether to file it under compiler or stdlibc++ as it’s accepted
> by another compilers using stdlibc++.
There's no such component, it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692
--- Comment #3 from Sergey Kaniskin ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Right the problem is here (and not with the compiler itself if there is a
> problem)
I was unsure whether to file it under compiler or stdlibc++ as it’s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Right the problem is here (and not with the compiler itself if there is a
> problem):
> /home/ubuntu/upstream-gcc/include/c++/11.0.1/ostream:747:46: error: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
