[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-08 08:03:22 UTC --- Just out of interest. What binutils version you are using? As error message indicates that the ld tool doesn't recognize -plugin command.

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #7 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2011-02-08 08:56:26 UTC --- The source of binutils for native compiler same as the cross building compiler, so I think this maybe an autotools bug of binutils:

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-08 09:25:38 UTC --- Is binutils build using option '--enable-plugins'? It is worth a try. AFAICS is there in ld's configure.ac a quirk about the header-check windows.h. It uses here

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #9 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2011-02-08 10:04:25 UTC --- Thanks, with the following patch (Windows.h = windows.h), the building OK now: $ git diff ld/configure.in ld/plugin.c diff --git a/ld/configure.in

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #11 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2011-02-08 11:04:32 UTC --- I don't known where I report the following issue: C:\gcc -O2 -pipe Hello.c C:\a Hello, World! C:\gcc -O2 -pipe -flto Hello.c

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-08 11:14:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) I don't known where I report the following issue: C:\gcc -O2 -pipe Hello.c C:\a Hello, World! C:\gcc -O2 -pipe -flto Hello.c

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-07 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #5 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2011-02-08 06:41:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Does it help on cross-compile to do after 'make all-gcc make install-gcc' to do additionally 'make install-lto-plugin'?

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-05 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-01-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mingw64-*-*

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-01-31 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #2 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2011-01-31 14:34:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) I think you use an old GCC snapshot (if you didn't pass -fuse-linker-plugin manually). That said, your target should not

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-01-31 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #3 from Dongsheng Song dongsheng.song at gmail dot com 2011-02-01 07:28:37 UTC --- Confirmed, $ svn info ${GCC_SOURCE_DIR} Path: /home/oracle/vcs/svn/gcc/trunk URL: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk Repository Root: