[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 13:14:58 UTC --- Also aborts w/o LTO but with -fwhole-program.

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 13:22:12 UTC --- The 1 is non-canonical: (gdb) call debug_tree ($1) integer_cst 0x75b25eb0 type integer_type 0x75b29540 constant 1 (gdb) call debug_tree

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 13:25:03 UTC --- A less intrusive variant of the patch might be suitable for backporting (it doesn't touch the NULL type argument path) and fixes the testcase for me.

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.1 |--- --- Comment

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 13:56:49 UTC --- That would be Index: gcc/fold-const.c === --- gcc/fold-const.c(revision 174066) +++

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-23 14:36:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Wonder if I'm not seeing it because my ld doesn't support plugins... That is true.

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 20:38:19 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 23 20:38:17 2011 New Revision: 174088 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174088 Log: PR lto/49123 *

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23 20:37:22 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 23 20:37:18 2011 New Revision: 174087 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174087 Log: PR lto/49123 *

[Bug lto/49123] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr48973-[12].c

2011-05-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49123 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED