[Bug lto/53337] 4.7.1 lto produces warning: relocation refers to discarded section in linker (gold, binutil 2.22)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53337 vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/53337] 4.7.1 lto produces warning: relocation refers to discarded section in linker (gold, binutil 2.22)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53337 --- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-05-15 10:19:29 UTC --- tested with latest binutil no change (but nicer error message) GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.22.52.20120515) 1.11

[Bug lto/53337] [4.7.1 lto] produces warning: relocation refers to discarded section in linker (gold, binutil 2.22)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53337 --- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-05-14 07:39:45 UTC --- Created attachment 27397 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27397 preprocessed file (for those not having boost)

[Bug lto/53337] 4.7.1 lto produces warning: relocation refers to discarded section in linker (gold, binutil 2.22)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53337 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail

[Bug lto/53337] 4.7.1 lto produces warning: relocation refers to discarded section in linker (gold, binutil 2.22)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53337 --- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-05-14 14:08:04 UTC --- I will try the trunk go binutils. Still I confirm that this warning does not appear at all (in real-life code, not just in the attached test