http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
--- Comment #10 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-30 15:24:24 UTC ---
reduced testcase for comment 3 regression as PR53821
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-29 06:11:19 UTC ---
seems fixed by the back-port published in comment 4 PR53768
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
--- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-29 07:39:02 UTC ---
The patch HAS a side effect that I observed also in 4.8 and had no time to
reduce yet.
(At least now I know the origin of it)
something pretty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-29 10:34:22 UTC ---
take back: (never do two updates at once)
in SOMETHING else committed between
gcc version 4.7.2 20120615 (prerelease) [gcc-4_7-branch revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-29
10:50:48 UTC ---
Candidates are
+2012-06-19 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
+
+ PR c++/52637
+ * dwarf2out.c (modified_type_die): Use scope_die_for.
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
--- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-29 13:20:31 UTC ---
the regression in comment 3 happens with
gcc version 4.7.2 20120620 (prerelease) [gcc-4_7-branch revision 188811] (GCC)
(and was a fix required
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
--- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-29 15:03:17 UTC ---
NOT when applied on the top of
gcc version 4.8.0 20120629 (experimental) [trunk revision 189073] (GCC)
svn diff
Index: gcc/tree.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
--- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-29 15:31:12 UTC ---
in any case the regression disappear if I declare inline the template methods
in question
templatetypename T
+ inline
bool
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
--- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-28 12:52:42 UTC ---
the failure on vanilla fedora may be related to PR53768
11 matches
Mail list logo
