http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
--- Comment #5 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-06-28
08:22:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 27715
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27715
ifort assembler
"Init" routine looks much better here
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
--- Comment #4 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-06-28
08:17:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 27714
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27714
gfort assembler
"Init" routine should be inspected here
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
--- Comment #2 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-06-27
17:56:48 UTC ---
The testcase was reduced from some real app. No inlining happened there.
Do you think this testcase is bad?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-27
17:39:23 UTC ---
AFAICT the subroutine is inlined with '-O3 -fwhole-program' or '-O3
-fwhole-program -flto' for 4.6.3, 4.7.1, and trunk. Indeed the inlining does
not occurs with the addition of
