http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
--- Comment #27 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-27
13:56:37 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 27 13:56:31 2012
New Revision: 193848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193848
Log:
Handle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-26
12:24:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Another problem with revision 191466 is we lost
debug info on cl_options. With revision 191465,
I got
(gdb)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
--- Comment #26 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-26 13:29:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
This means that somewhere there is a cl_option definition that may prevail
that has size 1. lto_symtab_resolve_symbols is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |lto
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
--- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-25 22:36:48
UTC ---
Another problem with revision 191466 is we lost
debug info on cl_options. With revision 191465,
I got
(gdb) whatis cl_options
type = const struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
--- Comment #24 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-25 22:39:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Another problem with revision 191466 is we lost
debug info on cl_options. With revision 191465,
I got
(gdb) whatis
