[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-25 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-25 14:52:37 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Oct 25 14:52:32 2012 New Revision: 192809 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192809 Log: PR

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-24 09:58:31 UTC --- i re-check 192757 --enable-checking=release FAIL with $ bash -x tf.sh + g++ -flto -fpreprocessed -c 1.ii -o 1.o + g++ -flto -O1 -fpreprocessed

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-24 10:00:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) This does not seem to reproduce for me. The following patch should however fix it. Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-24 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-24 12:50:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) This does not seem to reproduce for me. The following patch should however fix it. Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-23 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-23 14:48:05 UTC --- This does not seem to reproduce for me. The following patch should however fix it. Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-20 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-20 14:28:28 UTC --- 192529 OK 192538 FAIL

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-19 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-19 10:26:35 UTC --- 192517 OK 192548 FAIL

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-18 23:05:38 UTC --- 192502 OK $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-18 23:51:33 UTC --- more reduced $ cat 1.ii extern C class A { }; template int (*t_parser) () class B { virtual int parse () { A a;

[Bug lto/54980] [4.8 regression] gimple check: expected gimple_cond(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_cond_set_lhs, at gimple.h:2578

2012-10-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-19 00:08:54 UTC --- and more $ cat 1.ii class A { }; template int (*t_parser) () class B { virtual int parse () { A a; t_parser ();