http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:54:07 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jan 3 16:53:54 2013
New Revision: 194861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194861
Log:
Fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10
14:44:00 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Dec 10 14:43:54 2012
New Revision: 194359
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194359
Log:
Record the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-12-07 13:02:12
UTC ---
I am testing this patch:
---
diff --git a/gcc/lto-symtab.c b/gcc/lto-symtab.c
index 0b0cdac..295fd37 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-symtab.c
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-12-07 18:49:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
This patch:
diff --git a/gcc/lto-symtab.c b/gcc/lto-symtab.c
index 0b0cdac..295fd37 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-symtab.c
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-29
18:52:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 28829
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28829
Proposed fix
I suppose something across these lines should do the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-29 19:07:23
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Created attachment 28829 [details]
Proposed fix
I suppose something across these lines should do the trick. I am not sure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-29 19:08:28
UTC ---
This patch:
diff --git a/gcc/lto-symtab.c b/gcc/lto-symtab.c
index 0b0cdac..295fd37 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-symtab.c
+++ b/gcc/lto-symtab.c
@@ -443,10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-11-26 12:45:23 UTC
---
/export/project/git/gcc-regression-bootstrap/master/191466/bld/gcc/cc1...done.
(gdb) whatis global_options
type = data variable, no debug info
(gdb)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-26
15:57:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
/export/project/git/gcc-regression-bootstrap/master/191466/bld/gcc/cc1...done.
(gdb) whatis global_options
type =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-26 16:36:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Hmm, I suppose this is because we no longer merge symbols that are not part
of
symtab, but
used only for
14 matches
Mail list logo