subject:"\[Bug lto\/58733\] \[4.9 Regression\] ICE in operator\[\], at vec.h\:827"

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2014-03-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING ---

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2014-03-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Forgot to mention, I think the ICE is solved by the following patch: 2014-02-14 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz * lto-partition.c (add_symbol_to_partition_1,

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2014-03-02 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2014-01-18 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- With gold I get: markus@x4 lto % cat 20090302_0.C /* { dg-lto-do link } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target fpic } */ /* { dg-lto-options {{-fPIC -flto -flto-partition=1to1

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2014-01-16 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2013-12-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2013-12-04 Thread octoploid at yandex dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf octoploid at yandex dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) So, with r205392 now in, can this still be reproduced? Unfortunately, yes.

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2013-11-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2013-11-22 Thread octoploid at yandex dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf octoploid at yandex dot com --- FYI I'm running the latest binutils trunk: GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.24.51.20131121) 1.11 (I don't use -fuse-ld=gold normally, because one can easily switch linkers globally,

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2013-11-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) Seems like -fuse-ld=gold doesn't work with -flto, so not yet confirmed. with an installed compiler -fuse-ld=gold works. It would be nice

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

2013-11-06 Thread octoploid at yandex dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 --- Comment #3 from octoploid at yandex dot com --- The issue only happens when I use the 'gold' linker, ld.bfd is fine. So maybe a binutils bug? Honza?